USB-C is the Future, Just Not How Apple is Implementing It

Table of Contents


At last week’s special product event, Apple unveiled the all new MacBook with the promise that it was giving consumers a glimpse at the future of laptops in the process. The incredibly thin and light computer features a 12″ Retina display, a fully redesigned keyboard, a fan-less design, and an innovative new trackpad that features Force Touch interactivity. It also includes the brand new USB-C port, which has the potential to revolutionize the way we interact with our computers. The problem is, Apple has hamstrung the new MacBook by only including a single port, making USB-C seem more like an exercise in frustration rather than the giant leap forward that it could have been. 

For those who aren’t familiar with USB-C, it is a high-speed (10 Gbps) replacement for standard USB that is far more versatile than previous versions. USB-C is capable of not only connecting hard drives and printers, it can also accommodate external monitors, keyboards, Ethernet adapters, and even power supplies. In fact, the new MacBook does away with Apple’s iconic MagSafe power adapter in favor of a new version that charges the laptop via the USB-C port instead.

From that description alone, USB-C sounds like a fantastic replacement for standard USB. After all, it allows us to use one port and cable – along with appropriate adapters – to accomplish many different things. With other PC manufacturers already announcing its implementation, it is clear that USB-C will be the future of interactivity between our computers and various peripherals, opening the doors for all kinds of new possibilities.

But as they so often do, Apple has gone with a form-over-function approach with the new MacBook’s design, and limited the capabilities of USB-C simply by only including a single port. That means that you won’t be able to connect a secondary display to this laptop while also charging it at the same time. It also means that you can’t connect a printer and an external hard drive simultaneously either. A second port would have alleviated many of these concerns, and given users a much higher level of versatility when using their new laptops. But because Apple was so eager to make the new MacBook as streamlined as possible, they cut corners at the expense of usability, dropping Thunderbolt ports, mini-display ports, and even SD card slots in the process.


Apple will tell you that wireless networking has allowed them to eliminate unnecessary ports. The argument being that with WiFi enabled printers and network drives, we no longer need to connect to those peripherals directly. In some sense that is accurate, but it is also a bit shortsighted. Considering the fact that most people will keep their laptops plugged into a power source most of the time, the single USB-C port on the new MacBook will be occupied more often than not. What will those user do if they want to connect to a display? How about if they want to import photos from a digital camera, or even sync their iPhones? Out of the box, that simply isn’t possible due to the shortsighted decision to only include one port on the entire computer.

Of course, Apple is all too willing to sell you a USB-C adapter that will allow you to plug in extra devices to your new laptop. For a mere $79 you can add the functionality that the MacBook should have come with in the first place. These extra dongles will help bridge the gap for those who need the extra ports, but they are an inelegant solution for a computer that is incredibly elegant in every other way. Adding one of these adapters to the MacBook is bit like buying an Italian sports car, then bolting on a bike rack. It looks odd and out of place, and detracts from the appeal of the original product in an effort to make it more functional.

USB-C is welcome addition to the MacBook, and I suspect future revisions of the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro will include the new port as well. But in this first attempt to foist this new standard on users, Apple has made the port more of a challenge to adapt to than it needs to be. Yes, they have created a beautiful new laptop that is thinner and lighter than anything we’ve seen from the company before, but that design seems hardly worth the frustration that will come with having just one port for connecting all of our devices.


There may come a time when every device connects to our laptops wirelessly, and Apple’s decision to include a single port will seem wise. But we are not at that point just yet, and at the moment that decision looks like a mistake. As a point of reference, my 2013 MacBook Pro with Retina display currently has a keyboard, external display, and my iPad Mini plugged into its various ports. It is also charging via its MagSafe adapter as well. If I were using the new MacBook, three of those things would not be able to be plugged in at the same time.

I have no doubt that Apple will sell millions of new MacBooks. It is undeniably a beautiful computer. But many of those customers are also likely to experience a bit of buyers remorse when they realize the limitations of having just one port. Future versions of the laptop may remedy this oversight, but for now, the future of USB-C lies along a different path than the one that Apple has shown us.

Also Read:

5 Great New Games for iOS You Should Download Right Now
8 Tips to Help Your Mac Run More Efficiently


Disclaimer: Please note that some of the links in this article may be Amazon affiliate links. This means that if you make a purchase through those links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support our website and allows us to continue providing informative content about Apple products. Thank you for your support!

8 thoughts on “USB-C is the Future, Just Not How Apple is Implementing It

  1. I don’t see why everyone is freaking out about the one USB port.

    It won’t be long before there Kensinton, Belkin and other third-party manufacturers offer USB hubs fitted with USB-C connectors allowing them to be plugged between the Macbook’s power brick and the computer. These hubs will be bristling with standard USB sockets for your legacy peripherals and probably cost under $30 – $50.

    For those who need them, there will also be adaptors, docks, and breakout-boxes to support every conceivable combination of USB, Firewire, Thunderbolt, E-SATA, Ethernet, HDMI, SD card, and more.

    Problem solved.

    1. Agreed that there will be adapters and dongles to add ports, but as I mentioned in the article, that is an inelegant solution. Since this lone port is used for charging, and a whole lot more, Apple should have found a way to include at least one more on the new MacBook.

  2. ” that is an inelegant solution.”
    Stop with the closed minded thinking.
    That “inelegant solution” you refer to is actually a dock connector waiting to be utilized.
    Gad, how blind can you be to progress. Geez

    1. Asking for a second port is somehow blind to progress? I’d certainly agree that USB-C is the future, and said as much in the article. But an ultraportable laptop like the new MacBook is hamstrung by having one port and requiring a dock connector to make up for it.

  3. Oh ya. Apple keep making these decisions that cost money on top of the laptops where as the peripheral (if you can call it that) should be included with the laptop, which pisses people off since Apple makes enough on their hardware as it is.

  4. I believe it is more elegant than 4 cables sticking into the laptop.

    But then one man’s meat is another man’s poison.

  5. Everyone seems to forget about Airdrop which should also be factored into the equation. There is no need to talk about cords for picture transfers from the Iphone with cords if this protocol is used. This is not the computer for the desktop that many laptops are used as. This is for the person who has an ipad but really wants it to function more like a laptop more often and doesn’t want to tack on a keyboard all the time.

    1. Airdrop is great as long as you’re using it between Apple devices. But I regularly use a DSLR camera, as well as a couple of different point and shoots, which means I have to plug a camera into my computer to retrieve pictures. The iPhone is a decent camera, but it doesn’t replace a dedicated camera in certain circumstances.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share the Post:

Related Posts

A person sitting in a dark room illuminated by the glow of a large screen displaying the Apple TV interface with various app icons

The Best Horror Movies On Apple TV

Welcome to our guide on the spine-tingling world of horror movies, which you can watch exclusively on Apple TV.  Whether you’re a fan of psychological thrillers (Saw), supernatural scares (House),

Read More