Close this search box.

5 Reasons iPhone is a Terrible Name

Table of Contents

iphonereleasedatecountdown_20070110110016.jpgI listen to a lot of podcasts during my work day, and the iPhone has been a focus of a great many of them ever since the announcement at Macworld on the 9th. The more I hear people talk about it…and not the lawsuit over the name…but the actual device – the more I realize that the iPhone is a terrible name for what this thing is.


I’m glad you asked…

Way More than a Phone – iPhone is a terribly limiting name. All I hear anyone talking about are the phone features. They mention that you can watch movies, and they mention that it can surf the web, but primarily people are focusing on the phone aspects of the device by itself. When you look at the iPhone some of it’s biggest flaws are in the Phone aspect of the device…the lack of tactile feedback for the keyboard and the Cingular service are things that people have really focused negatively on…and I think it’s more than just people’s desire to focus on the negative aspects of the device…I think the name has a lot to do with it.

Apps – Apple is controlling the applications on it. It’s not a smartphone, and you can’t develop for it without getting special permission and approval from Apple. Calling the device “iPhone” immediately brings comparisons to the Smartphone market…but Apple insists that it’s not a Smartphone. If they want users to think of it as an iPod that you can make phone calls and chat with (which seems to be what they want you to think since Jobs insists it’s not a computer, it’s an iPod) then “Phone” shouldn’t be in the name.

The “i” – The whole “i” thing is played out, and tired. I’m so sick of seeing little i’s in front of words I could scream. I get that they’re kinda locked into it on the iPod, but come on – the whole “i” concept screams 1995.

The Price – Again…the name draws focus solely on the phone functionality, and people are screaming that it’s way too expensive, and really over-priced. When you break it down, however, the device is an iPod that is heads and shoulders above the iPod Nano that you would pay $199 for…it has many of the features that Smartphones have, and several that they don’t, and they run an average of $200…plus it has a full web experience and high resolution screen that makes it comparable to a Pepper Pad or the Nokia N800 which will run you from $399 to $499 alone!

Cisco – This battle between Cisco and Apple over the iPhone is a waste of time and energy. The name isn’t that great to begin with, and average consumers are going to be confused if they walk into a store and the iPhone they see is a VOIP device that isn’t made by Apple. IMO, the name isn’t worth fighting for, and yes, doing so may get it in the news, but if Apple does come out on top of this with the name, it’s going to make them look like they “stole” it from Cisco…and yes, I understand that Cisco is a much larger company and may have lost the trademark on their own…but it’s still going to come out like Apple bullied them out of it…especially with the way the Cisco lawyers have been blogging like they’re the underdog. It’s press Apple doesn’t need while they’re charge $1.99 for 802.11n, and not letting 3rd parties freely develop on the device.

If you start adding up what this device can actually do, $499 to $599 doesn’t seem quite so out of whack…

So there you have it. I think iPhone is a terrible name, and I’d love to see it called just about ANYTHING else…having said that…I can’t wait to get one. 🙂

Kokou Adzo

Kokou Adzo

Kokou Adzo is a stalwart in the tech journalism community, has been chronicling the ever-evolving world of Apple products and innovations for over a decade. As a Senior Author at Apple Gazette, Kokou combines a deep passion for technology with an innate ability to translate complex tech jargon into relatable insights for everyday users.

6 thoughts on “5 Reasons iPhone is a Terrible Name

  1. I agree with your post: iPhone means just another “phone” with an “i” trying to make it look coller than the other “phones”…
    I would have called it iPod Phone, since I think that the best part of that contraption is the “iPod” part, not the “phone” one.
    given this approach, Apple could simply strip down the phone section to get an iPod Video (maybe 8Gb is not a proper size for an iPod Video, but maybe if you take the phone hw away there is room anough for a bihher hd).

  2. By the way, next to last paragraph – you’re down by $100 on the prices you quote…

    I’d like to get one at $499, too, but it ain’t gonna happen.

  3. The whole “i” thing was played out over 10 years ago! I’m so sick of it… Hardly anyone remembers the original concept behind the “i;” it was for the iMac and it stood for “internet.” I can see where that fits in with the iPhone, but what about the thousands of other products with the stupid “i” in the title? Lame.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts