<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the Keynote (WWDC 2007)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/</link>
	<description>Your Ultimate Guide to Thinking Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13642</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13642</guid>
		<description>@Anders

No, the issue is with the speed of your high speed access, that is how the quality of the stream is determined.  

It has absolutely nothing to do with the OS.  If you take that 5-year-old Compaq home it&#039;ll do the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anders</p>
<p>No, the issue is with the speed of your high speed access, that is how the quality of the stream is determined.  </p>
<p>It has absolutely nothing to do with the OS.  If you take that 5-year-old Compaq home it&#8217;ll do the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13635</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13635</guid>
		<description>Strange, but I really could not watch the keynote on my new (Intel) MacBook running MAC OS X, the Greatest Operating System in the History of the Universe according to the Appleists. The quality is just too crappy!!! The quality was much better on my work PC, which is a 5-year-old Compaq running XP. Is there some kind of conspiracy in the works?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange, but I really could not watch the keynote on my new (Intel) MacBook running MAC OS X, the Greatest Operating System in the History of the Universe according to the Appleists. The quality is just too crappy!!! The quality was much better on my work PC, which is a 5-year-old Compaq running XP. Is there some kind of conspiracy in the works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13272</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13272</guid>
		<description>I think you are right on, Michael. There is no need for RDF for the developers. Just give them the info that they need to develop. They don&#039;t need RDF. Consumers do, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right on, Michael. There is no need for RDF for the developers. Just give them the info that they need to develop. They don&#8217;t need RDF. Consumers do, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13234</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13234</guid>
		<description>I think it was a great keynote. Many people think Steve is God and can do everything. The new finder is just a cool en practical update, together with quicklook. Safari for windows is little bit buggy. But I guess it&#039;s mentioned for the iPhone, sync bookmarks.. and maybe other new thing. When is the next event? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was a great keynote. Many people think Steve is God and can do everything. The new finder is just a cool en practical update, together with quicklook. Safari for windows is little bit buggy. But I guess it&#8217;s mentioned for the iPhone, sync bookmarks.. and maybe other new thing. When is the next event? <img src='http://www.applegazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Vague</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13222</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Vague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13222</guid>
		<description>I think most of you seem to be forgetting what WWDC was... a DEVELOPERS conference. Why people thought hardware was going to be the focus is beyond me. 

All in all i felt that the keynote was a good, exciting look at leopard, which is totally what i expected it would be. Leopard looks awesome, the changes to  finder looks like a major advance. Finally a decent way to view photos directly from finder, the coverflow thing seemed like a gimmik at first, but thinking about it this is exactly what i have wanted in OSX for ages. Windows has easy ways to view photos, now so does OSX... neat :-)

As for quick look, that seems like an awesome idea to me. Being able to quickly look at a doc or keynote is a great idea and will increase productivity. 

Then there is the changes to networking. Searching remote computers, including windows boxes, is simply amazing stuff and will improve my mac experience tenfold.

All in all a thoroughly exciting prospect :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of you seem to be forgetting what WWDC was&#8230; a DEVELOPERS conference. Why people thought hardware was going to be the focus is beyond me. </p>
<p>All in all i felt that the keynote was a good, exciting look at leopard, which is totally what i expected it would be. Leopard looks awesome, the changes to  finder looks like a major advance. Finally a decent way to view photos directly from finder, the coverflow thing seemed like a gimmik at first, but thinking about it this is exactly what i have wanted in OSX for ages. Windows has easy ways to view photos, now so does OSX&#8230; neat <img src='http://www.applegazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for quick look, that seems like an awesome idea to me. Being able to quickly look at a doc or keynote is a great idea and will increase productivity. </p>
<p>Then there is the changes to networking. Searching remote computers, including windows boxes, is simply amazing stuff and will improve my mac experience tenfold.</p>
<p>All in all a thoroughly exciting prospect <img src='http://www.applegazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krye</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13219</link>
		<dc:creator>krye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13219</guid>
		<description>I am also dissapointed that no new harware was debuted. But you have to consider the audience. They are developers, do they care about a new Cinema Display with built in iSight camera, or a new black iMac? Probably not. They are there for software. To that point, I wonder why Xcode wasn&#039;t mentioned, or Xserve for that matter. The only development tool I saw was DashCode, but come on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also dissapointed that no new harware was debuted. But you have to consider the audience. They are developers, do they care about a new Cinema Display with built in iSight camera, or a new black iMac? Probably not. They are there for software. To that point, I wonder why Xcode wasn&#8217;t mentioned, or Xserve for that matter. The only development tool I saw was DashCode, but come on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13213</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13213</guid>
		<description>DAMN people are becoming more and more like small kids moaning: &quot;Uhhahh, I&#039;m pissed cause dad didn&#039;t bring me the toys I had wished all day he would buy for me, cause I deserve it, I&#039;m so bored, instead he only brought home... Icecream.... wroahh, I don&#039;t want icecream, I want what I wished for all day... braahh&quot;

Damn, people! Go donate some money to Africa, enjoy your freedom to buy Path Finder, download Quicksilver, or whatever, and save your money and stay on Tiger until the next major update.

The transparant menu is something many users have wished for, which is why Merlin Mann f.e. use Menu Shade to dim the menu. Of course Apple&#039;s implementation will allow the UI-purists to adjust the opacity to 100% should they wish to. What&#039;s the problem?

And the web-apps for iPhone controversy? Bah, dear developers, swallow your feeling of being so hurt, go eat that icecream, and develop Cocoa-apps for the Mac, og see it as a challenge to do great web-apps for the iPhone. Nobody, not even allmighty Apple owe you anything. Before the Keynote, you had nothing but a wish. Now you at least have something. What is the loss if your never had anything in the first place?

Geez. I think it was a good Keynote. Don&#039;t underestimate the potential of Core Animation to the UI experience.

Less whine, more sunshine;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAMN people are becoming more and more like small kids moaning: &#8220;Uhhahh, I&#8217;m pissed cause dad didn&#8217;t bring me the toys I had wished all day he would buy for me, cause I deserve it, I&#8217;m so bored, instead he only brought home&#8230; Icecream&#8230;. wroahh, I don&#8217;t want icecream, I want what I wished for all day&#8230; braahh&#8221;</p>
<p>Damn, people! Go donate some money to Africa, enjoy your freedom to buy Path Finder, download Quicksilver, or whatever, and save your money and stay on Tiger until the next major update.</p>
<p>The transparant menu is something many users have wished for, which is why Merlin Mann f.e. use Menu Shade to dim the menu. Of course Apple&#8217;s implementation will allow the UI-purists to adjust the opacity to 100% should they wish to. What&#8217;s the problem?</p>
<p>And the web-apps for iPhone controversy? Bah, dear developers, swallow your feeling of being so hurt, go eat that icecream, and develop Cocoa-apps for the Mac, og see it as a challenge to do great web-apps for the iPhone. Nobody, not even allmighty Apple owe you anything. Before the Keynote, you had nothing but a wish. Now you at least have something. What is the loss if your never had anything in the first place?</p>
<p>Geez. I think it was a good Keynote. Don&#8217;t underestimate the potential of Core Animation to the UI experience.</p>
<p>Less whine, more sunshine;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattFM</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13203</link>
		<dc:creator>MattFM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13203</guid>
		<description>Nice to see some positive spin on what was a complete waste of everyone&#039;s time. Why it was necessary to gather so many people from all over the US and make them listen to nothing new getting announced I don&#039;t know. A press release would have been much more sensible. The thing about hype is, it has to be created. Apple created it. THEY built up everyone&#039;s hopes yesterday and THEY almost everyone down. The falling value on Apple&#039;s stocks speaks volumes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see some positive spin on what was a complete waste of everyone&#8217;s time. Why it was necessary to gather so many people from all over the US and make them listen to nothing new getting announced I don&#8217;t know. A press release would have been much more sensible. The thing about hype is, it has to be created. Apple created it. THEY built up everyone&#8217;s hopes yesterday and THEY almost everyone down. The falling value on Apple&#8217;s stocks speaks volumes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple's WWDC: Prime Example of Wasting Ad Views - Tech Soapbox</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13201</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple's WWDC: Prime Example of Wasting Ad Views - Tech Soapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13201</guid>
		<description>[...] was Apple&#8217;s WWDC 2007 event, complete with Steve Jobs&#8217; keynote (many people felt disappointed by the announcements, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was Apple&#8217;s WWDC 2007 event, complete with Steve Jobs&#8217; keynote (many people felt disappointed by the announcements, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roz</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13196</link>
		<dc:creator>roz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13196</guid>
		<description>I thought the keynote was a little slow and we have all seen a lot of that stuff before.  

Also, not that I expected it, but the part about no SDK for iPhone as a downer.  They really need a way to have a persistent offline app. 

On the whole though I am excited about leopard, and more so to see all the apps use core animation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the keynote was a little slow and we have all seen a lot of that stuff before.  </p>
<p>Also, not that I expected it, but the part about no SDK for iPhone as a downer.  They really need a way to have a persistent offline app. </p>
<p>On the whole though I am excited about leopard, and more so to see all the apps use core animation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Chuo</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13195</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Chuo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13195</guid>
		<description>Ever since Mac OS X 10.4 (a.k.a. Tiger), Mac OS X became a platform that helps developers come up awesome products. Mac OS X became more like a technology demonstration to developers, which shows the possibility. If you expect Mac OS X to be like the original Macintosh, you would certainly feel a bit disappointed. However, if you look at Leopard as an innovation forge for developers, it would be an exciting release. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since Mac OS X 10.4 (a.k.a. Tiger), Mac OS X became a platform that helps developers come up awesome products. Mac OS X became more like a technology demonstration to developers, which shows the possibility. If you expect Mac OS X to be like the original Macintosh, you would certainly feel a bit disappointed. However, if you look at Leopard as an innovation forge for developers, it would be an exciting release. <img src='http://www.applegazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13194</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13194</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really shaky regarding this whole issue. On one hand, i agree with all of you guys, that it didn&#039;t have the RDF that we all wanted and anticipated. Especially when his Steveness mentioned in January that he was only showcasing just ten of the many secret features of Leopard. I guess that itself caused us to really expect much more.

On the other hand, I ask myself: what else can Apple offer? Is this not good enough? and i find myself saying that Leopard IS in fact, awesome, but just not groundbreaking. I guess all of us were waiting for something to blow our minds away: 3D interfaces, ZFS?, crazy things out of our wildest imaginations, but we didn&#039;t get them. HOWEVER, i am really looking forward to 10.6, it would either be a complete flop (if apple cannot find anymore revolutionary ideas) or totally RDF-ed (if 10.6 could introduce even better, intuitive functionality)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really shaky regarding this whole issue. On one hand, i agree with all of you guys, that it didn&#8217;t have the RDF that we all wanted and anticipated. Especially when his Steveness mentioned in January that he was only showcasing just ten of the many secret features of Leopard. I guess that itself caused us to really expect much more.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I ask myself: what else can Apple offer? Is this not good enough? and i find myself saying that Leopard IS in fact, awesome, but just not groundbreaking. I guess all of us were waiting for something to blow our minds away: 3D interfaces, ZFS?, crazy things out of our wildest imaginations, but we didn&#8217;t get them. HOWEVER, i am really looking forward to 10.6, it would either be a complete flop (if apple cannot find anymore revolutionary ideas) or totally RDF-ed (if 10.6 could introduce even better, intuitive functionality)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13192</guid>
		<description>When they first showed off leopard it looking boring... and it still looks boring. Not as bring (at least the UI will be unified finally) but still...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When they first showed off leopard it looking boring&#8230; and it still looks boring. Not as bring (at least the UI will be unified finally) but still&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick O'Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13183</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick O'Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13183</guid>
		<description>I avoided news of the Keynote all day yesterday until I could watch it for myself... I like to get the whole &quot;Jobs effect&quot;. I finally watched it around 10pm, poor quality and all. Unfortunately I was a little disappointed, not that the new stuff wasn&#039;t very cool... I just expected one moment of &quot;holy crap, thats going to be freakin&#039; awesome!&quot; I hoped to see something completely new. But in the back of my head I knew this was a developers conference and not necessarily the place to unveil new hardware. I am however confident that there will be that moment when we are presented with something truly revolutionary... In the mean time I&#039;m going to avoid rumors and speculation and stick with whats real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I avoided news of the Keynote all day yesterday until I could watch it for myself&#8230; I like to get the whole &#8220;Jobs effect&#8221;. I finally watched it around 10pm, poor quality and all. Unfortunately I was a little disappointed, not that the new stuff wasn&#8217;t very cool&#8230; I just expected one moment of &#8220;holy crap, thats going to be freakin&#8217; awesome!&#8221; I hoped to see something completely new. But in the back of my head I knew this was a developers conference and not necessarily the place to unveil new hardware. I am however confident that there will be that moment when we are presented with something truly revolutionary&#8230; In the mean time I&#8217;m going to avoid rumors and speculation and stick with whats real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-13179</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/wwdc/thoughts-on-the-keynote-wwdc-2007/#comment-13179</guid>
		<description>Meh, I dunno I was expecting a lot more and well I should. Apple didn&#039;t really pull through this time, its a nice update yea, but this should have come at an earlier date, and delaying it until October seems a little much for something thats really not that mind blowing (its nice don&#039;t get me wrong) I guess I was just really pissed off seeing Finder get a overhaul and they forgot allow tabs within Finder windows. Thats one thing that always pissed me off. Instead of making a extremely useful feature for organizing your windows, they release Cover Flow which is nice for albums, but I&#039;ll never use it for files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, I dunno I was expecting a lot more and well I should. Apple didn&#8217;t really pull through this time, its a nice update yea, but this should have come at an earlier date, and delaying it until October seems a little much for something thats really not that mind blowing (its nice don&#8217;t get me wrong) I guess I was just really pissed off seeing Finder get a overhaul and they forgot allow tabs within Finder windows. Thats one thing that always pissed me off. Instead of making a extremely useful feature for organizing your windows, they release Cover Flow which is nice for albums, but I&#8217;ll never use it for files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

