<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leopard to exclude 800MHz systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/speculation/leopard-to-exclude-800mhz-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/speculation/leopard-to-exclude-800mhz-systems/</link>
	<description>Your Ultimate Guide to Thinking Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjurn</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/speculation/leopard-to-exclude-800mhz-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-31080</link>
		<dc:creator>bjurn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/speculation/leopard-to-exclude-800mhz-systems/#comment-31080</guid>
		<description>And what if 10.6 will not support PowerPCs? Is 10.5 (or earlier) instant obsolete? It still works does it?

I totally agree with Krye, it is called progress. I still got a 286 at home, do I expect that it will run windows vista? Of course not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what if 10.6 will not support PowerPCs? Is 10.5 (or earlier) instant obsolete? It still works does it?</p>
<p>I totally agree with Krye, it is called progress. I still got a 286 at home, do I expect that it will run windows vista? Of course not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krye</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/speculation/leopard-to-exclude-800mhz-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-30920</link>
		<dc:creator>krye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/speculation/leopard-to-exclude-800mhz-systems/#comment-30920</guid>
		<description>Yes, full of crap. The PPC is not obsolete just yet. I can see on some other sites, that people are already becoming outraged at the 800 MHz cap. Come on people, you can&#039;t expect your ancient hardware to be supported forever! It&#039;s called progress; and really, would you want it to be? Running Leopard on a G3 is going to be worse than pulling teeth. How would you expect to get anything done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, full of crap. The PPC is not obsolete just yet. I can see on some other sites, that people are already becoming outraged at the 800 MHz cap. Come on people, you can&#8217;t expect your ancient hardware to be supported forever! It&#8217;s called progress; and really, would you want it to be? Running Leopard on a G3 is going to be worse than pulling teeth. How would you expect to get anything done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/speculation/leopard-to-exclude-800mhz-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-30919</link>
		<dc:creator>B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/speculation/leopard-to-exclude-800mhz-systems/#comment-30919</guid>
		<description>So would a 1.33 GHz PowerBook G4 be able to use it???

Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So would a 1.33 GHz PowerBook G4 be able to use it???</p>
<p>Thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

