<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking Back: OS X on x86 &#8220;Stupidest Thing Apple Could Do&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:31:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Download Microsoft Office 2003 Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/comment-page-1/#comment-64958</link>
		<dc:creator>Download Microsoft Office 2003 Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/#comment-64958</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top 10 Ways to Procrastinate Your Small Business Upgrade to Microsoft Office XP...&lt;/strong&gt;

Article Title: Top 10 Ways to Procrastinate Your Small Business Upgrade to Microsoft Office XP...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top 10 Ways to Procrastinate Your Small Business Upgrade to Microsoft Office XP&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Article Title: Top 10 Ways to Procrastinate Your Small Business Upgrade to Microsoft Office XP&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WillGonz</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>WillGonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there is a ton of money to be made in hardware.  Let&#039;s see, you build a computer for $400 dollars.  You sell it for $500.  You make a $100 profit.
 or  
You write an OS.  You press the discs for pennies and sell it for hundreds.  You profit hundreds.

I like the Apple Hardware. Heck, comparing Mac to PCs is like comparing BMW&#039;s to Toyotas.  I like all the bells and whistles that you get on a mac.

However, I would like to see OS X&#039;s install base grow.  If folks can install it legally on P4 boxes.  I can see more people buying the software for their already purchased computer.

However, as Mac Sales are up,  I don&#039;t see Apple doing this just yet.  But what OS are people really installing on their Macs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is a ton of money to be made in hardware.  Let&#8217;s see, you build a computer for $400 dollars.  You sell it for $500.  You make a $100 profit.<br />
 or<br />
You write an OS.  You press the discs for pennies and sell it for hundreds.  You profit hundreds.</p>
<p>I like the Apple Hardware. Heck, comparing Mac to PCs is like comparing BMW&#8217;s to Toyotas.  I like all the bells and whistles that you get on a mac.</p>
<p>However, I would like to see OS X&#8217;s install base grow.  If folks can install it legally on P4 boxes.  I can see more people buying the software for their already purchased computer.</p>
<p>However, as Mac Sales are up,  I don&#8217;t see Apple doing this just yet.  But what OS are people really installing on their Macs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Looking Back: OS X on x86 &#8220;Stupidest Thing Apple Could Do&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Looking Back: OS X on x86 &#8220;Stupidest Thing Apple Could Do&#8221;?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>[...] I stumbled upon an article on Low End Mac written by Jeff Adkins exactly four years ago (October 17th, 2002) detailing the author &#8217;s opinion that &#8220;OS X on x86 would be the stupidest business decision in history.&#8221; That was the time when an x86 version of OS X (Project Marklar) was still very much under wraps, and all sorts of leaks&#8211;whether fabricateread more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I stumbled upon an article on Low End Mac written by Jeff Adkins exactly four years ago (October 17th, 2002) detailing the author &rsquo;s opinion that &ldquo;OS X on x86 would be the stupidest business decision in history.&rdquo; That was the time when an x86 version of OS X (Project Marklar) was still very much under wraps, and all sorts of leaks&ndash;whether fabricateread more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac/intel != win/intel &#183; disordered thought processes</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>mac/intel != win/intel &#183; disordered thought processes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>[...] J Angelo Racoma looks back at the argument that Apple switching to the x86 would be tantamount to the suicide of Apple Computer, Inc.. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] J Angelo Racoma looks back at the argument that Apple switching to the x86 would be tantamount to the suicide of Apple Computer, Inc.. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking Back: OS X on x86 “Stupidest Thing Apple Could Do”? &#124; j4s0n Talks</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking Back: OS X on x86 “Stupidest Thing Apple Could Do”? &#124; j4s0n Talks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/rumors/looking-back-os-x-on-x86-stupidest-thing-apple-could-do/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>[...] I stumbled upon an article on Low End Mac written by Jeff Adkins exactly four years ago (October 17th, 2002) detailing the author ’s opinion that “OS X on x86 would be the stupidest business decision in history.” That was the time when an x86 version of OS X (Project Marklar) was still very much under wraps, and all sorts of leaks–whether fabricateread more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I stumbled upon an article on Low End Mac written by Jeff Adkins exactly four years ago (October 17th, 2002) detailing the author ’s opinion that “OS X on x86 would be the stupidest business decision in history.” That was the time when an x86 version of OS X (Project Marklar) was still very much under wraps, and all sorts of leaks–whether fabricateread more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
