<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MOAB Loses all Credibility on Day Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rom</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2882</link>
		<dc:creator>rom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/#comment-2882</guid>
		<description>can we all get along here?

okay maybe not. it is still sad to read all the comments here. people are nitpicking each others opinion. its an opinion not a fact. but as long as it gets attention on both end of the &quot;issue&quot; then lets get pwned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can we all get along here?</p>
<p>okay maybe not. it is still sad to read all the comments here. people are nitpicking each others opinion. its an opinion not a fact. but as long as it gets attention on both end of the &#8220;issue&#8221; then lets get pwned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun Muralidharan</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun Muralidharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>Sorry Michael, My Spam Karma was weirdly strict today... purged all of my comments I got... will get back to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Michael, My Spam Karma was weirdly strict today&#8230; purged all of my comments I got&#8230; will get back to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zade</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Zade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>Is it ran on an apple os/hardware setup? yes
Is it a bug? yes

I fail to see how this is even worth getting upset about.

Pretty much every exploit out there is accessed via a piece of vulnerable software.

The OS *by itself* is nearly impervious across the board. Linux and Windows included.


The main point in OS security is : Can the OS detect this kind of attack and block it from functioning?

This particular example is done via putting in string data into program text sections. It&#039;s something that the no-execute bit was supposed to prevent. Someone should look into how the OS is handling this &#039;data as code&#039; issue and improve the support for no-ex. (This applies to all OS&#039;s that are affected by this exploit).

-zade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it ran on an apple os/hardware setup? yes<br />
Is it a bug? yes</p>
<p>I fail to see how this is even worth getting upset about.</p>
<p>Pretty much every exploit out there is accessed via a piece of vulnerable software.</p>
<p>The OS *by itself* is nearly impervious across the board. Linux and Windows included.</p>
<p>The main point in OS security is : Can the OS detect this kind of attack and block it from functioning?</p>
<p>This particular example is done via putting in string data into program text sections. It&#8217;s something that the no-execute bit was supposed to prevent. Someone should look into how the OS is handling this &#8216;data as code&#8217; issue and improve the support for no-ex. (This applies to all OS&#8217;s that are affected by this exploit).</p>
<p>-zade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>@ Moto

I disagree, sir.  You can call it a VLC bug that affects OS X, Windows, and Linux.  If you went by your logic you could even say it&#039;s an OS X bug, which STILL doesn&#039;t make it an Apple bug.

Apple didn&#039;t make the software so it isn&#039;t an Apple bug.  Microsoft didn&#039;t make the software so it isn&#039;t a Microsoft bug either...etc...etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Moto</p>
<p>I disagree, sir.  You can call it a VLC bug that affects OS X, Windows, and Linux.  If you went by your logic you could even say it&#8217;s an OS X bug, which STILL doesn&#8217;t make it an Apple bug.</p>
<p>Apple didn&#8217;t make the software so it isn&#8217;t an Apple bug.  Microsoft didn&#8217;t make the software so it isn&#8217;t a Microsoft bug either&#8230;etc&#8230;etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotoRAZR Maxx v6</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator>MotoRAZR Maxx v6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/moab/moab-loses-all-credibility-on-day-two/#comment-2865</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Michael can be described affectionately as a &#039;fanboi&#039;. Face reality Michael, it&#039;s an exploit that works on a Mac, therefore it definitely qualifies as an Apple bug. You can also call it a Linux bug, a Windows bug, or whatever operating system is affected bug, nevertheless you can&#039;t deny it&#039;s an Apple bug just because it exists on other platforms.

By your logic we should exclude yesterday&#039;s bug too since it affects other platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Michael can be described affectionately as a &#8216;fanboi&#8217;. Face reality Michael, it&#8217;s an exploit that works on a Mac, therefore it definitely qualifies as an Apple bug. You can also call it a Linux bug, a Windows bug, or whatever operating system is affected bug, nevertheless you can&#8217;t deny it&#8217;s an Apple bug just because it exists on other platforms.</p>
<p>By your logic we should exclude yesterday&#8217;s bug too since it affects other platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
