<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SPECULATION: 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/</link>
	<description>Your Ultimate Guide to Thinking Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doodee</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-56520</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-56520</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPECULATIONS: Not 5, but 6 Predictions for Microsoft in 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-38869</link>
		<dc:creator>SPECULATIONS: Not 5, but 6 Predictions for Microsoft in 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-38869</guid>
		<description>[...] thought Apple Gazette had an endearing article on the 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007. I thought it must follow that the same should be extended to Microsoft and also the Linux [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thought Apple Gazette had an endearing article on the 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007. I thought it must follow that the same should be extended to Microsoft and also the Linux [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weight loss</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-10013</link>
		<dc:creator>weight loss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-10013</guid>
		<description>HOLLYWOOD â€“ April, 2007 â€“ Blu-ray Disc has become the first high definition format to sell more than one million discs, a milestone it has achieved in less than a year. Blu-ray Disc sales also accounted for 70 percent of the high-definition movies sold during the first quarter of 2007, according to sales figures published today by Home Media Research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOLLYWOOD â€“ April, 2007 â€“ Blu-ray Disc has become the first high definition format to sell more than one million discs, a milestone it has achieved in less than a year. Blu-ray Disc sales also accounted for 70 percent of the high-definition movies sold during the first quarter of 2007, according to sales figures published today by Home Media Research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleGazette: 5 predicciones para Apple en 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2808</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleGazette: 5 predicciones para Apple en 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2808</guid>
		<description>[...] VÃ­a &#124; Apple Slashdot MÃ¡s informaciÃ³n &#124; Speculation: 5 predictions for Apple in 2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VÃ­a | Apple Slashdot MÃ¡s informaciÃ³n | Speculation: 5 predictions for Apple in 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bushel of Apple Links &#124; Desperately Wandering</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2734</link>
		<dc:creator>A Bushel of Apple Links &#124; Desperately Wandering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2734</guid>
		<description>[...] TUAW&#8217;s Predictions for Macworld 2007 - Also check out Applegazettes &#8220;5 Predictions for Apple in 2007&#8243; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TUAW&#8217;s Predictions for Macworld 2007 &#8211; Also check out Applegazettes &#8220;5 Predictions for Apple in 2007&#8243; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Interestings for 2006-12-29 &#187; Whatever&#8217;s Interesting</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Interestings for 2006-12-29 &#187; Whatever&#8217;s Interesting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>[...] SPECULATION: 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007 A prediction list for Apple, because &#8220;I just can&#8217;t get enough&#8221; Yay! (tags: Apple) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SPECULATION: 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007 A prediction list for Apple, because &#8220;I just can&#8217;t get enough&#8221; Yay! (tags: Apple) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Mobile, Web Mobile, Broadband&#8230; cosa vedremo nel 2007? - VOIPBLOG.IT</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP Mobile, Web Mobile, Broadband&#8230; cosa vedremo nel 2007? - VOIPBLOG.IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple Gazette: 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007 Il brand &#8220;Mac&#8221; si espande (iPhone=MacMobile?); il vero &#8220;Video&#8221; ipod; i nuovi iMacs; Blackberry e Palm nel mirino di Apple; OsX e Windows insieme grazie a Parallels integrato in Leopard (qui l&#8217;ultima beta). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple Gazette: 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007 Il brand &#8220;Mac&#8221; si espande (iPhone=MacMobile?); il vero &#8220;Video&#8221; ipod; i nuovi iMacs; Blackberry e Palm nel mirino di Apple; OsX e Windows insieme grazie a Parallels integrato in Leopard (qui l&#8217;ultima beta). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Mobile, Web Mobile, Broadband&#8230; cosa vedremo nel 2007? - VOIPBLOG.IT</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP Mobile, Web Mobile, Broadband&#8230; cosa vedremo nel 2007? - VOIPBLOG.IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple Gazette: 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007 Il brand &#8220;Mac&#8221; si espande (iPhone=MacMobile?); il vero &#8220;Video&#8221; ipod; i nuovi iMacs; Blackberry e Palm nel mirino di Apple; OsX e Windows insieme grazie a Parallels integrato in Leopard (qui l&#8217;ultima beta). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple Gazette: 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007 Il brand &#8220;Mac&#8221; si espande (iPhone=MacMobile?); il vero &#8220;Video&#8221; ipod; i nuovi iMacs; Blackberry e Palm nel mirino di Apple; OsX e Windows insieme grazie a Parallels integrato in Leopard (qui l&#8217;ultima beta). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-2/#comment-2471</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2471</guid>
		<description>The new video iPod will never come out....ever</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new video iPod will never come out&#8230;.ever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just me a Mac fan</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator>Just me a Mac fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2039</guid>
		<description>I see the &#039;future Mac&#039;s&#039; all going quad-core processors with something avalable to run other OS&#039;s inside it fully. Just give them a little time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the &#8216;future Mac&#8217;s&#8217; all going quad-core processors with something avalable to run other OS&#8217;s inside it fully. Just give them a little time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustSomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2010</link>
		<dc:creator>JustSomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2010</guid>
		<description>Wow... Apple providing yet another way of pirating Windows.  Or are you honestly going to claim that all the Windows installs on Intel Macs are legit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; Apple providing yet another way of pirating Windows.  Or are you honestly going to claim that all the Windows installs on Intel Macs are legit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>So Windows apps in OS X. OS X on x86. All in all it means making the Mac product line some fancy extra that you start on your Windows PC when you show it to your friends (bought a PC from a company called Apple, which has a great music player demo)...

The idea of integrating windows (the mainstream os) into a technically superior environment is old. See OS/2, with WinOS/2 and the DOS-VM. The result was that IBM spent their money in supporting Windows- and DOS-apps to run in OS/2 instead of spending the money in native apps. And of course, the most recent Windows- and DOS apps always had problems on OS/2, so people became disappointed (why does superior OS mean old applications...).

IMHO, if Apple is spending too much energy in making windows apps run on Macs, they will only loose their audience. The key in Macs is that they are relyable for multimedia work, rather clean and safe, foolproof and you do not have to read windows magazines to use them. If I get the media-mess from the windows world (btw, I would really like to get proper color management on the windows-pc I use in office at the moment), add a risk for viruses and troyans, add some tweaks and advanced compatibility modes for all kind of windows-os, and spend my time reading articles on how to keep my windows app running on the mac after applying MS&#039; latest service pack... they I have wasted my budget and a nice OS.

So I hope Apple keeps in mind what they have, what they can provide, and who can use their products. So far for the windows-on-mac hype.

BTW, to make Windows and Macs work together, simply use applications the support open standards. Than you can add other OSs to your list of options, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Windows apps in OS X. OS X on x86. All in all it means making the Mac product line some fancy extra that you start on your Windows PC when you show it to your friends (bought a PC from a company called Apple, which has a great music player demo)&#8230;</p>
<p>The idea of integrating windows (the mainstream os) into a technically superior environment is old. See OS/2, with WinOS/2 and the DOS-VM. The result was that IBM spent their money in supporting Windows- and DOS-apps to run in OS/2 instead of spending the money in native apps. And of course, the most recent Windows- and DOS apps always had problems on OS/2, so people became disappointed (why does superior OS mean old applications&#8230;).</p>
<p>IMHO, if Apple is spending too much energy in making windows apps run on Macs, they will only loose their audience. The key in Macs is that they are relyable for multimedia work, rather clean and safe, foolproof and you do not have to read windows magazines to use them. If I get the media-mess from the windows world (btw, I would really like to get proper color management on the windows-pc I use in office at the moment), add a risk for viruses and troyans, add some tweaks and advanced compatibility modes for all kind of windows-os, and spend my time reading articles on how to keep my windows app running on the mac after applying MS&#8217; latest service pack&#8230; they I have wasted my budget and a nice OS.</p>
<p>So I hope Apple keeps in mind what they have, what they can provide, and who can use their products. So far for the windows-on-mac hype.</p>
<p>BTW, to make Windows and Macs work together, simply use applications the support open standards. Than you can add other OSs to your list of options, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w4 network - wayne on the world wide web - technology, gadgets, web 2.0, blogs, news, money, affiliates &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007 predictions review: all mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator>w4 network - wayne on the world wide web - technology, gadgets, web 2.0, blogs, news, money, affiliates &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007 predictions review: all mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2007</guid>
		<description>[...] Read/WriteWeb - 2007 Web Predictions Mashableâ€™s 2007 Predictions Applegazette - 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read/WriteWeb &#8211; 2007 Web Predictions Mashableâ€™s 2007 Predictions Applegazette &#8211; 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper Zuschlag</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper Zuschlag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>&quot;Symbian OS is just a face on top of a linux system.. why couldnâ€™t mobile OS X be the same thing?&quot;

Symbian has nothing to do with Linux what so ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Symbian OS is just a face on top of a linux system.. why couldnâ€™t mobile OS X be the same thing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Symbian has nothing to do with Linux what so ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2005</guid>
		<description>Steve Jobs has always stated publicly that most windows apps were poor.  Why would you want to run them?  Adding too much windows infrastructure invites tens of thousands of viruses/trojans/etc.  If Apple wrote their own apps (Pages is weak, keynote eh.) and made them great and continued on OSX integration, who needs MS Office?  Most windoze apps write in doc format.  Pages does.  So do most PC-Unix (Trovalds gets too much credit) word processors.  Apple needs a seriously awesome Office Suite, greater user control from a central server, and they could finally punch their way into the business world.

I&#039;m voting for Blu-Ray.

How far is 802.11n?  

What I want more than anything (never happen though) is to be able to upgrade my existing G5 Dual PPC cpu system without a complete replacement.  But that&#039;s an old wish that died on our wish lists long long ago.  I can always extend the life of my PC&#039;s with a few parts replaced.  That&#039;s why they have such staying power in my world.

I definitly think the brand will expand in the new year but not like wildfire until they can make a serious attempt at dethroning MS Office.

-PCWOOD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Jobs has always stated publicly that most windows apps were poor.  Why would you want to run them?  Adding too much windows infrastructure invites tens of thousands of viruses/trojans/etc.  If Apple wrote their own apps (Pages is weak, keynote eh.) and made them great and continued on OSX integration, who needs MS Office?  Most windoze apps write in doc format.  Pages does.  So do most PC-Unix (Trovalds gets too much credit) word processors.  Apple needs a seriously awesome Office Suite, greater user control from a central server, and they could finally punch their way into the business world.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m voting for Blu-Ray.</p>
<p>How far is 802.11n?  </p>
<p>What I want more than anything (never happen though) is to be able to upgrade my existing G5 Dual PPC cpu system without a complete replacement.  But that&#8217;s an old wish that died on our wish lists long long ago.  I can always extend the life of my PC&#8217;s with a few parts replaced.  That&#8217;s why they have such staying power in my world.</p>
<p>I definitly think the brand will expand in the new year but not like wildfire until they can make a serious attempt at dethroning MS Office.</p>
<p>-PCWOOD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedy of Skidrow</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedy of Skidrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>Well, Macs better get Blu-Ray :P It&#039;s the future. I would be very sad if i had to get 30 GB Storage when i can do 50GB right away on my backups. So we need Blu-Ray drives. Dell also included Blu-Ray drives in some top pc&#039;s now. I see no need to support a smaller player like Toshiba with their own format. Let em die with it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Macs better get Blu-Ray <img src='http://www.applegazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s the future. I would be very sad if i had to get 30 GB Storage when i can do 50GB right away on my backups. So we need Blu-Ray drives. Dell also included Blu-Ray drives in some top pc&#8217;s now. I see no need to support a smaller player like Toshiba with their own format. Let em die with it <img src='http://www.applegazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnygreb</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnnygreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>When the IPod can browse the web through 802.11 AND do everything it can currently do, then I&#039;ll consider getting one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the IPod can browse the web through 802.11 AND do everything it can currently do, then I&#8217;ll consider getting one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whos wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>Whos wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-2002</guid>
		<description>Someone should put these predictions on http://www.whoswrong.com.  So we can actually track these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone should put these predictions on <a href="http://www.whoswrong.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.whoswrong.com</a>.  So we can actually track these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-1994</guid>
		<description>Its very easy to say something like &quot;Vista...who?&quot;, however, to all the Windows bashers out there I am curious as to how you would handle a large scale deployment in a coporate environment.  Does Apple truly offer a worthy alternative to Group Policy, SMS, and other mechanisms for controlling and managing laptops and workstations?  

As far as ruling the smartphone market - the single biggest driver here in my opinion is Exchange integration which is handled natively by Windows phones or via a conduit such as the Blackberry BES.  Most people you see with Windows Smartphones or Blackberrys are corporate folks.  How would Apple compete with this?

I like Apple as much as the next guy and happily use one in my home environment, however, corporate acceptance is a big factor with more and more folks bringing their work home with them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its very easy to say something like &#8220;Vista&#8230;who?&#8221;, however, to all the Windows bashers out there I am curious as to how you would handle a large scale deployment in a coporate environment.  Does Apple truly offer a worthy alternative to Group Policy, SMS, and other mechanisms for controlling and managing laptops and workstations?  </p>
<p>As far as ruling the smartphone market &#8211; the single biggest driver here in my opinion is Exchange integration which is handled natively by Windows phones or via a conduit such as the Blackberry BES.  Most people you see with Windows Smartphones or Blackberrys are corporate folks.  How would Apple compete with this?</p>
<p>I like Apple as much as the next guy and happily use one in my home environment, however, corporate acceptance is a big factor with more and more folks bringing their work home with them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1993</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-1993</guid>
		<description>#1: Apple will pull their heads out of their asses and bring back the PowerPC! #2: Windows integration? who the f**k needs/wants that?! #3: Opensource everything!  #4: Will realize there is no room for computers in a post-apocalyptic war zone, and will concentrate all energies to improving the typewriter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1: Apple will pull their heads out of their asses and bring back the PowerPC! #2: Windows integration? who the f**k needs/wants that?! #3: Opensource everything!  #4: Will realize there is no room for computers in a post-apocalyptic war zone, and will concentrate all energies to improving the typewriter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007&#8242;de Apple&#8217;da 5 Ã–nemli Olay &#171; Atom GÃ¼venlik Grubu</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>2007&#8242;de Apple&#8217;da 5 Ã–nemli Olay &#171; Atom GÃ¼venlik Grubu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-1988</guid>
		<description>[...] Kaynak [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kaynak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>@Fatty --

A Mac with no optical drive will not happen in the foreseeable future. Too much software is still distributed on CD and DVD (including OS X itself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fatty &#8211;</p>
<p>A Mac with no optical drive will not happen in the foreseeable future. Too much software is still distributed on CD and DVD (including OS X itself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faizan.hozter.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>faizan.hozter.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;2006 is coming to a close, and all anyone can think about (in regards to Apple, at least) is the upcoming Apple phone, but what happens next? What are we going to be salivating over and speculating about after Macworld? What changes are in store for Apple in 2007? No one knows for sure, but it sure is fun to take a guess.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;2006 is coming to a close, and all anyone can think about (in regards to Apple, at least) is the upcoming Apple phone, but what happens next? What are we going to be salivating over and speculating about after Macworld? What changes are in store for Apple in 2007? No one knows for sure, but it sure is fun to take a guess.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkryft</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkryft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>These are certainly good technical predictions in the way of Apple, but before I could comment on any of that - I ultimately have to see what comes of the story that broke yesterday concerning Jobs&#039; mishandling of his stock options.   Granted, even if he is completely vindicated as a fraudulent CEO, Apple will go on, but the public may not forgive the company for it.  Yesterday Apple&#039;s stock was all over the place, but managed to not finish badly.  Apple has become a company that mroe and more people have their faith within, like Google, and this certainly could affect more than one of the good predictions in 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are certainly good technical predictions in the way of Apple, but before I could comment on any of that &#8211; I ultimately have to see what comes of the story that broke yesterday concerning Jobs&#8217; mishandling of his stock options.   Granted, even if he is completely vindicated as a fraudulent CEO, Apple will go on, but the public may not forgive the company for it.  Yesterday Apple&#8217;s stock was all over the place, but managed to not finish badly.  Apple has become a company that mroe and more people have their faith within, like Google, and this certainly could affect more than one of the good predictions in 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Mobil Content &#187; xmen legends 2 age of apocalypse costumes screenshot 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Mobil Content &#187; xmen legends 2 age of apocalypse costumes screenshot 5 Predictions for Apple in 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/speculation-5-predictions-for-apple-in-2007/#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>[...] xmen legends 2 age of apocalypse costumes screenshot Apple Gazette writes, &quot;What are we going to be salivating over and speculating about after Macworld? What changes are in store for Apple in 2007? No one knows for sure&#8230;but it sure is fun to take a guess&#8230;&quot; xmen legends 2 homing beacons xboxread more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] xmen legends 2 age of apocalypse costumes screenshot Apple Gazette writes, &quot;What are we going to be salivating over and speculating about after Macworld? What changes are in store for Apple in 2007? No one knows for sure&hellip;but it sure is fun to take a guess&hellip;&quot; xmen legends 2 homing beacons xboxread more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

