<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 $$$ saving Apps for Graphic Artists on OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mac Tips: Alternative to Pricey Software at LifeSpy</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-4325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Tips: Alternative to Pricey Software at LifeSpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/#comment-4325</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: Apple Gazette  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: Apple Gazette  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-4070</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/#comment-4070</guid>
		<description>Ok nevermind. But after reading:
---
Probably the buggiest of any of the software I’m going to mention today, Pixel Image Editor is still a great, and inexpensive alternative to Photoshop.
---
It just doesn&#039;t sound like that, it&#039;s not mentioned that it is actually Beta as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok nevermind. But after reading:<br />
&#8212;<br />
Probably the buggiest of any of the software I’m going to mention today, Pixel Image Editor is still a great, and inexpensive alternative to Photoshop.<br />
&#8212;<br />
It just doesn&#8217;t sound like that, it&#8217;s not mentioned that it is actually Beta as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-4068</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/#comment-4068</guid>
		<description>Pavel - 

I don&#039;t agree.  What I have said, and continue to say is that Pixel is very good in it&#039;s current state...as it is further developed it will get even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pavel &#8211; </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree.  What I have said, and continue to say is that Pixel is very good in it&#8217;s current state&#8230;as it is further developed it will get even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-4061</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/#comment-4061</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not what I mean. If you compare finished and beta programs and by writing Pixel is buggy and you recommend GIMP for use, Pixel comes as a very bad piece of software from this. However final version will be a different class than GIMP having proper color management, adjustment layers, layer effects, support for CMYK, Lab and even HDR editing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not what I mean. If you compare finished and beta programs and by writing Pixel is buggy and you recommend GIMP for use, Pixel comes as a very bad piece of software from this. However final version will be a different class than GIMP having proper color management, adjustment layers, layer effects, support for CMYK, Lab and even HDR editing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-4048</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/5-saving-apps-for-graphic-artists-on-os-x/#comment-4048</guid>
		<description>Pavel, I am aware the Pixel is beta software, but I have not had any serious problems with it.  If you read the article I believe you will see that not only did I mention it is a bit buggy at times, but I also suggested GIMP for users as well, which is a final product.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pavel, I am aware the Pixel is beta software, but I have not had any serious problems with it.  If you read the article I believe you will see that not only did I mention it is a bit buggy at times, but I also suggested GIMP for users as well, which is a final product.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
