<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple announces new Mac Pro and Xserve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/mac-pros/apple-announces-new-mac-pro-and-xserve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac-pros/apple-announces-new-mac-pro-and-xserve/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: krye</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/mac-pros/apple-announces-new-mac-pro-and-xserve/comment-page-1/#comment-51623</link>
		<dc:creator>krye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac-pros/apple-announces-new-mac-pro-and-xserve/#comment-51623</guid>
		<description>Awesome. 

I&#039;ve been waiting a year for the new Mac Pro. I am bumbed that the 3.2GHz one is so expensive ($4399). I was hoping that the price would have stayed at $3299. I forgot that these are 8 cores. The old 3.0GHz 8 core machine was $3999, so I guess $400 for the new architecture? Still, a little rich for my blood, and my wallet. Looks like I&#039;ll have to settle for the 2.8 or the 3.0.

Although, I bet the new 2.8 is faster that the old 3.0. Maybe I&#039;ll wait for some bench marks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting a year for the new Mac Pro. I am bumbed that the 3.2GHz one is so expensive ($4399). I was hoping that the price would have stayed at $3299. I forgot that these are 8 cores. The old 3.0GHz 8 core machine was $3999, so I guess $400 for the new architecture? Still, a little rich for my blood, and my wallet. Looks like I&#8217;ll have to settle for the 2.8 or the 3.0.</p>
<p>Although, I bet the new 2.8 is faster that the old 3.0. Maybe I&#8217;ll wait for some bench marks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
