<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Stupid do you have to be to work for the RIAA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be-to-work-for-the-riaa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be-to-work-for-the-riaa/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:46:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: marks.dk &#187; Still gotta go, dear driver&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be-to-work-for-the-riaa/comment-page-1/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>marks.dk &#187; Still gotta go, dear driver&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be-to-work-for-the-riaa/#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>[...] Oh, and if you haven&#8217;t noticed; Apple and Apple stopped arguing. Now Beatles are coming (though it may not be exclusively to iTunes, and therefore probably no Beatles iPod), and I hope it will be without DRM as Steve Jobs voted for. Note about the DRM-case: Make a search on TUAW, Macworld, Macrumors etc. for some more articles about it. Doug even got nostalgic and all. In whole, it&#8217;s a quite interesting story, and I can give a little teaser about it with an unusually funny statement from RIAA (which proves they don&#8217;t get ANYTHING of what Steve Jobs wrote&#8230;), as well as an upfront stupid statement from one of the Zune-guys. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oh, and if you haven&#8217;t noticed; Apple and Apple stopped arguing. Now Beatles are coming (though it may not be exclusively to iTunes, and therefore probably no Beatles iPod), and I hope it will be without DRM as Steve Jobs voted for. Note about the DRM-case: Make a search on TUAW, Macworld, Macrumors etc. for some more articles about it. Doug even got nostalgic and all. In whole, it&#8217;s a quite interesting story, and I can give a little teaser about it with an unusually funny statement from RIAA (which proves they don&#8217;t get ANYTHING of what Steve Jobs wrote&#8230;), as well as an upfront stupid statement from one of the Zune-guys. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Tune &#187; RIAA Misunderstanding their own market</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be-to-work-for-the-riaa/comment-page-1/#comment-4712</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Tune &#187; RIAA Misunderstanding their own market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/how-stupid-do-you-have-to-be-to-work-for-the-riaa/#comment-4712</guid>
		<description>[...] I am in total, 100% agreement with Michael over at Apple Gazette, on the RIAA&#8217;s inability to comprehend the fact that an ally (which, undoubtedly is what Steve Jobs must seem to them) just lined them up in front of a wall, caressing an AK47 gently whilst whispering the lyrics to &#8216;Sun is Shining&#8217; by the great Bob Marley. They just don&#8217;t seem to get which side of the firing-line they reside. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am in total, 100% agreement with Michael over at Apple Gazette, on the RIAA&#8217;s inability to comprehend the fact that an ally (which, undoubtedly is what Steve Jobs must seem to them) just lined them up in front of a wall, caressing an AK47 gently whilst whispering the lyrics to &#8216;Sun is Shining&#8217; by the great Bob Marley. They just don&#8217;t seem to get which side of the firing-line they reside. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
