<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Children&#8217;s Hospital&#8221; premieres in iTunes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/childrens-hospital-premieres-in-itunes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/childrens-hospital-premieres-in-itunes/</link>
	<description>Your Ultimate Guide to Thinking Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/childrens-hospital-premieres-in-itunes/comment-page-1/#comment-89822</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/childrens-hospital-premieres-in-itunes/#comment-89822</guid>
		<description>@Dennis

AT&amp;T also doesn&#039;t censor the Internet.  Between the Internet and the podcasts I don&#039;t think that&#039;s truly the issue.  If it was, Apple should let us host our own apps so that we can side step it.  

Either way, it&#039;s a completely ridiculous double-standard that is driving developers away.  Hell, they even have a double standard within the app store itself.  You can shoot bloody zombies in the face all day long on an iPhone video game - but if you show that in an iPhone graphic novel you get rejected.  

It makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dennis</p>
<p>AT&#038;T also doesn&#8217;t censor the Internet.  Between the Internet and the podcasts I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s truly the issue.  If it was, Apple should let us host our own apps so that we can side step it.  </p>
<p>Either way, it&#8217;s a completely ridiculous double-standard that is driving developers away.  Hell, they even have a double standard within the app store itself.  You can shoot bloody zombies in the face all day long on an iPhone video game &#8211; but if you show that in an iPhone graphic novel you get rejected.  </p>
<p>It makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/childrens-hospital-premieres-in-itunes/comment-page-1/#comment-89777</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/itunes/childrens-hospital-premieres-in-itunes/#comment-89777</guid>
		<description>I think the reason for the double standard is because of the carriers.  AT&amp;T has a long list of what you can and can&#039;t access over their wireless network -- unfortunately, I don&#039;t have a link for the document anymore, but it was quite extensive.

The point I am trying to get at is that while the App Store is available over the cellular network, the iTunes store is not -- therefore, AT&amp;T and the rest of the carriers can&#039;t censor what is made available.  

Interestingly enough, 2.2 now allows for podcasts to be downloaded over the cellular network too -- I wonder if Apple is able to sidestep the carrier censoring since the podcasts aren&#039;t hosted by Apple and are instead downloaded directly over the Internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason for the double standard is because of the carriers.  AT&amp;T has a long list of what you can and can&#8217;t access over their wireless network &#8212; unfortunately, I don&#8217;t have a link for the document anymore, but it was quite extensive.</p>
<p>The point I am trying to get at is that while the App Store is available over the cellular network, the iTunes store is not &#8212; therefore, AT&amp;T and the rest of the carriers can&#8217;t censor what is made available.  </p>
<p>Interestingly enough, 2.2 now allows for podcasts to be downloaded over the cellular network too &#8212; I wonder if Apple is able to sidestep the carrier censoring since the podcasts aren&#8217;t hosted by Apple and are instead downloaded directly over the Internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

