<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why an iPod Shuffle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/why-an-ipod-shuffle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/why-an-ipod-shuffle/</link>
	<description>Your Ultimate Guide to Thinking Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/why-an-ipod-shuffle/comment-page-1/#comment-97994</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/?p=6679#comment-97994</guid>
		<description>I agree with Dan Ashley. The shuffle is just a very simple music player that is small and unobtrusive. When running or doing other physical activities, you don&#039;t want to be playing around with controls, options, or play lists. You just want the music to play. And, because of the small size, you aren&#039;t worried about it breaking if you drop it. Other than for exercise, I don&#039;t use the shuffle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Dan Ashley. The shuffle is just a very simple music player that is small and unobtrusive. When running or doing other physical activities, you don&#8217;t want to be playing around with controls, options, or play lists. You just want the music to play. And, because of the small size, you aren&#8217;t worried about it breaking if you drop it. Other than for exercise, I don&#8217;t use the shuffle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/why-an-ipod-shuffle/comment-page-1/#comment-97992</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/?p=6679#comment-97992</guid>
		<description>If you are engaging in vigorous athletic activity, like running a marathon, playing basketball, digging in your garden, etc. you will prefer a smaller device with less bounce. You will prefer the shuffle.

The shuffle, thus, is not your main player. It is a player for special purposes, an addition to your existing player, not a substitute for it. 

Sort of like having a bicycle. It is not a substitute for your car. Most bike owners have both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are engaging in vigorous athletic activity, like running a marathon, playing basketball, digging in your garden, etc. you will prefer a smaller device with less bounce. You will prefer the shuffle.</p>
<p>The shuffle, thus, is not your main player. It is a player for special purposes, an addition to your existing player, not a substitute for it. </p>
<p>Sort of like having a bicycle. It is not a substitute for your car. Most bike owners have both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/why-an-ipod-shuffle/comment-page-1/#comment-97991</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/?p=6679#comment-97991</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure where you are shopping for the Nano but it&#039;s $70 more than the Shuffle...unless you are counting the $20 for the adapter as part of the cost...because the way I read your article it seemed that you were saying the Nano was $50 more than the Shuffle and has the extra benefits making it worth the price

sorry but I was confused by your wording</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure where you are shopping for the Nano but it&#8217;s $70 more than the Shuffle&#8230;unless you are counting the $20 for the adapter as part of the cost&#8230;because the way I read your article it seemed that you were saying the Nano was $50 more than the Shuffle and has the extra benefits making it worth the price</p>
<p>sorry but I was confused by your wording</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlyCasual</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/why-an-ipod-shuffle/comment-page-1/#comment-97988</link>
		<dc:creator>FlyCasual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/?p=6679#comment-97988</guid>
		<description>I own several iPods (as most Apple fans do) and the shuffle is consistently my &quot;go to&quot;. (I have the green square clip version, not the smaller stick of gum version.) The size, portability, weight, and no fear of losing/scratching/having it stolen are the main reasons I listen to more music on the shuffle than I do my iPhone. Add an amazing battery life and it&#039;s absolutely worth the price.

Would I use the shuffle as a hub for my home entertainment system? No. But that&#039;s not what it&#039;s designed for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own several iPods (as most Apple fans do) and the shuffle is consistently my &#8220;go to&#8221;. (I have the green square clip version, not the smaller stick of gum version.) The size, portability, weight, and no fear of losing/scratching/having it stolen are the main reasons I listen to more music on the shuffle than I do my iPhone. Add an amazing battery life and it&#8217;s absolutely worth the price.</p>
<p>Would I use the shuffle as a hub for my home entertainment system? No. But that&#8217;s not what it&#8217;s designed for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

