<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RUMOR w/ Video: 6G iPod UI revealed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-21296</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/#comment-21296</guid>
		<description>I believe it to be fake but just for the hell of it, it could be the interface for the rumored iPhone nano as from the patents it has a clickwheel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it to be fake but just for the hell of it, it could be the interface for the rumored iPhone nano as from the patents it has a clickwheel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrad</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s a fake, it&#039;s a convincing one. While I can say that I am a shade tired of the existing interface, it STILL works incredibly well. I&#039;m not in favor of change for the sake of change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s a fake, it&#8217;s a convincing one. While I can say that I am a shade tired of the existing interface, it STILL works incredibly well. I&#8217;m not in favor of change for the sake of change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohcyt</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-21253</link>
		<dc:creator>ohcyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/#comment-21253</guid>
		<description>I am holding out on my first iPod purchase because I&#039;m way more into movies than music. I really need a portable movie player, and I was hoping the 6G would be just that. It makes sense to differentiate iPod from iPhone by giving the first a hell of a lot more disk space (a real disk, no flash) and perhaps a bigger battery to allow longer movie playback. Reserving the cool multi-touch interface for iPhone would seriously limit the appeal of any new iPod. Steve said it himself, the iPhone has the best iPod they&#039;ve ever made. It&#039;s in Apples interest to keep their bestselling MP3 player line appealing by giving it the same options. 
And clearly, the iPhone has a lot more to offer than just the widescreen-coverflow-iPod thingy, so there&#039;s no need to keep that goodness iPhone-only.

Oh, on the movie: it better be fake, because it&#039;s nothing really new. Luckily there&#039;s more than enough things done wrong in it (clock moves smooth, doesn&#039;t tick - clock shows wrong time - Beatles album is said to have wrong tracks on it) to make me hope that it&#039;s a fake. Apple legal has not really pulled it, all MacRumors has said was &#039;Removed per request from Apple legal&#039;. This could mean they simply asked for a favor. Some MR forum guy said that if MR didn&#039;t delete the files, they would be left out of the loop for future happenings/press releases/etc. It could have been Apple legal asking for a fover, but not forcing MacRumors. This makes sense since there are still the YouTube videos, that haven&#039;t been pulled yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am holding out on my first iPod purchase because I&#8217;m way more into movies than music. I really need a portable movie player, and I was hoping the 6G would be just that. It makes sense to differentiate iPod from iPhone by giving the first a hell of a lot more disk space (a real disk, no flash) and perhaps a bigger battery to allow longer movie playback. Reserving the cool multi-touch interface for iPhone would seriously limit the appeal of any new iPod. Steve said it himself, the iPhone has the best iPod they&#8217;ve ever made. It&#8217;s in Apples interest to keep their bestselling MP3 player line appealing by giving it the same options.<br />
And clearly, the iPhone has a lot more to offer than just the widescreen-coverflow-iPod thingy, so there&#8217;s no need to keep that goodness iPhone-only.</p>
<p>Oh, on the movie: it better be fake, because it&#8217;s nothing really new. Luckily there&#8217;s more than enough things done wrong in it (clock moves smooth, doesn&#8217;t tick &#8211; clock shows wrong time &#8211; Beatles album is said to have wrong tracks on it) to make me hope that it&#8217;s a fake. Apple legal has not really pulled it, all MacRumors has said was &#8216;Removed per request from Apple legal&#8217;. This could mean they simply asked for a favor. Some MR forum guy said that if MR didn&#8217;t delete the files, they would be left out of the loop for future happenings/press releases/etc. It could have been Apple legal asking for a fover, but not forcing MacRumors. This makes sense since there are still the YouTube videos, that haven&#8217;t been pulled yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-21250</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/#comment-21250</guid>
		<description>Stupid fake: Have you seen the watch settings? They all show 4:55 on the watch but in the text you see 5:55.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid fake: Have you seen the watch settings? They all show 4:55 on the watch but in the text you see 5:55.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apple_gigs</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-21245</link>
		<dc:creator>apple_gigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/ipod/rumor-w-video-6g-ipod-ui-revealed/#comment-21245</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t take it so personaly... This is only my opinion from the milions of Apple Users.About the Player was Sony the model.. was.. my point was that the software need a bit upgrade.It&#039;s basiclly the same as the ipod G1 but with color UI and Video play back opition and a few minor details.So chill out and drink a cold beer on me ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t take it so personaly&#8230; This is only my opinion from the milions of Apple Users.About the Player was Sony the model.. was.. my point was that the software need a bit upgrade.It&#8217;s basiclly the same as the ipod G1 but with color UI and Video play back opition and a few minor details.So chill out and drink a cold beer on me <img src='http://www.applegazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
