Also, you can use this on a mac. Yes, you can. Again…if you’re not smart enough to do it…then why why why!!!!????

You’re allowed to think whatever you like. I’m not correcting a statement that is true with one that would be false. It was NOT a pain to download this with the resources that I already have on my Mac.

This statement: “So if you’re not running a virtualization program or boot camp, then you’re out of luck.”

from the article makes it pretty clear that you can’t do this without those things installed.

I’m not going to write an article trying to make this look harder than it is. I don’t assume that there is anyone out there that is going to drop $80 for Fusion, and another $300 + for Windows Vista just so they can download music from Wal-mart.

That’s ridiculous.

The complete “all in all” statement that seems to be bothering you so much even says that this is only a good option if you ALREADY have Parallels and/or Fusion and Vista and/or XP.

This is an Apple blog. About APPLE products. You can run Vista very well on any current Apple Computer – so we’re going to talk about that from time to time. There are users out there who want to do that. This article is written for those people.

We’re not towing the “party line” here and treating Windows like an enemy on this site. If you already have those things in place this is a viable alternative to using the iTunes store – and very easy to use. There was no hacking or lengthy set of steps to go through.

Yeah, I had to install a small program. Now that I’ve installed it – I won’t have to again – and I just might use this service again in the future if I want to download a Universal Music album or track DRM Free – because I can’t do that in iTunes.

It doesn’t mean there is anything WRONG with iTunes. Wal-mart has entered the market with a very competitive deal, and it should be discussed. If Apple wants to keep iTunes the #1 place for music downloads, they need to keep the DRM-Free pricing the same as the DRMed pricing.

Wal-Mart has managed to do it – so it can be done. In most cases, Wal-Mart gets away with this stuff because they have more volume than anyone else, but in this case Apple sells way more tracks than Wal-Mart – so I’m betting they can do this too.

This is my opinion. If you don’t share it – more power to you…but please don’t pick part of a paragraph from this article and act like I’m trying to mislead my readers.

The statement is correct as is.

Not only is iTunes already installed on all Macs, but it is -not- an application “just too buy the nusic too”, it’s primary purpose is managing a music library across machines/devices and playing music.

iTunes is an application that most users have to download just to buy the music too, so I didn’t consider that a big deal.

Wal-Mart is one of the most evil corporations in the entire world, and before you write any sort of an article that even comes CLOSE to supporting them, you should rent the movie “Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price”.

You can learn more about the movie here:

Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price
http://www.walmartmovie.com

Wal-Mart is EVIL. And they are pulling many of their “same old tricks” again with this new music downloading pricing scheme.

It’s not as if the iTunes Store gets the lion’s share of what the end user pays: the record label gets that.

Maybe Walmart is shaving its margins pretty thin, possibly even taking a loss, to pull custom in. Or perhaps Universal is giving Walmart a more generous wholesale price to enable them to undercut Apple.

Universal would certainly like trade to move away from the iTunes Store, because Apple insists on a lowish standard pricing. Universal, and the record labels in general, would prefer working with online retail stores who’d agree to variable pricing — i.e., who’d agree to push the price *up* on tracks/albums that people want badly … in effect, stuff that the labels have convinced the kids they want badly through their marketing.

They might think offering Walmart and others a good deal on the wholesale price on at least *some* tracks would be a price worth paying to get people who do buy downloads used to going elsewhere than iTunes for them. That would undermine Apple’s power in negotiating terms with Universal, wouldn’t it? If that’s what this is about, those customers would be setting themselves up for a price hike, wouldn’t they?

I’m not so keen on buying downloads that are watermarked, anyway. These MP3s, apparently, are:

http://www.wired.com/entertainment/music/commentary/listeningpost/2007/08/listeningpost_0820

Contrary to the false rumours circulating when the iTunes Plus files were released they are *not* watermarked. They have a little metadata in ordinary MP4 atoms that is fairly easily removed and that seems to be to do with Apple’s administration needs not EMI’s “piracy” fears. That’s not, apparently, true with Universal’s MP3s: they *do* have watermarking — identifiers that are, so to speak, woven all through the audio content of the files.

I don’t like that. Apple/EMI trusts me; Magnatune trusts me; the Linn Records download store trusts me; eMusic trusts me. But, apparently, Universal doesn’t.

They can go and boil their heads. It’ll be a cold day in hell before I’ll buy Universal’s MP3s and further their schemes.

Um, are you KIDDING me?
You can’t use Firefox, you can’t use safari, you need to use IE, on WINDOWS, so you need to have windows, you need to download a custom app just to download songs?

I understand what you are TRYING to say, but it could have gone WAY simpler – you could have been able to click on songs and download them after entering a password for the purchase, or something like that. They could have made a cross platform downloader, I can continue – but the hoops you went through to support Walmart were FAR from smooth…

The people who are fanatics about DRM know how to a) buy a CD, b) download it for free and c) are not that inclinced to shop at walmart anyway and d) hate the record labels anyway – so who’s your audience?

Besides all these companies keep switching and making new services, MTV, Microsoft, you name it, they keep scrapping failed stores and starting new ones, ruining any brand recognition they may have gotten. Apple keeps everything relating back to iTunes. I doubt anyone will really stop Apple unless all providers pull their music.

I’m pretty sure Apple isn’t getting the extra $ for these DRM-Free songs. Which I personally won’t by, because I have iTunes/iPod and I LOVE IT… On a Mac by the way…

Anyhow, so to stick it to Apple or “keep them from becoming” to powerful, some labels decide NOT to resign there contracts.

Low and behold, NOW they are offering DRM-Free music for less at Wal-Mart. What the F***!!!

Ok, what really pisses me off is the fact that these morons at the labels think the world revolves around them. All I want is to get my music at the same place, the same way. I will NOT jump all over the web to get my music. If I’m forced to do that, I WILL START STEALING!! And to this day, EVERYTHING in my library has been purchased (by me).

Way to go big music labels. You’re pissing legitimate users off and you’ll start loosing sales if you keep this crap up.

Thanks,
An annoyed, trying to stay honest music purchaser….

This is a Mac site for sure, but I think that Fusion and Parallels are very popular programs.

I think more and more users have or will have these programs. In fact, these programs are one of the ways that it’s become so easy to convince Windows users that I talk to that they have nothing to fear when switching.

So one of the things I want to be sure and provide on this site are tips and reviews for those new users who have just switched.

Honestly the thing that I feel makes the current Mac line the – bar none – best set of computers in the world, is the fact that you can run Windows, Linux, AND OS X on them.

I was not suggesting that any one was telling me to, just that if you don’t already have these programs (as most Mac users don’t, and this is a Mac site after all) then this has to be factored in if you want to use the site.

On another affront, the walmart site makes an asumption that if you are not using either Sin200 or XP that you _must_ be using 98, ME or NT (God help the barbarians, if you are using a non-MS product…)

“We’re sorry, your operating system is incompatible. To provide the best download experience, we can no longer support Windows 98, ME or NT. Please visit again after you upgrade to Windows 2000 or XP. Visit our Help section for complete system requirements information.”

And I was Firefox on FreeBSD… D’oh! (So that would be a downgrade to 2000 or XP

TBM

You have to install a Windows only application – so, unfortunately, that won’t work.

No one is telling you to go buy Parallels/Fusion and Vista just to get songs from Wal-mart.

And the bit rates in the DRM Free tracks are the same.

TBM.