<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looks like it may not be &#8220;iPhone&#8221; after all&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:31:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mrad</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sick of the &quot;i&quot; prefix. It&#039;s played out. I know they have alot of brand equity in it, but I think they&#039;ve trapped themselves. The iPhone could have been their way out, but oh well.

The sad thing is that it&#039;s all the third party folks that make all the crap for Macs and iPod that have driven the &quot;i&quot; into the ground. But it doesn&#039;t look as though Apple&#039;s ready to break away from it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sick of the &#8220;i&#8221; prefix. It&#8217;s played out. I know they have alot of brand equity in it, but I think they&#8217;ve trapped themselves. The iPhone could have been their way out, but oh well.</p>
<p>The sad thing is that it&#8217;s all the third party folks that make all the crap for Macs and iPod that have driven the &#8220;i&#8221; into the ground. But it doesn&#8217;t look as though Apple&#8217;s ready to break away from it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>My favorite choice is still MacMobile, but I definetly think they should drop the &quot;i&quot;...it&#039;s not worth a court battle...or even a licensing fee.  Why pay Cisco anything at all when you can just call it something else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite choice is still MacMobile, but I definetly think they should drop the &#8220;i&#8221;&#8230;it&#8217;s not worth a court battle&#8230;or even a licensing fee.  Why pay Cisco anything at all when you can just call it something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coldeve</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>Coldeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>To be honest I was disappointed when it was called iPhone because I thought Apple was done using &quot;i&quot; and had moved on to &quot;Mac&quot; or &quot;&quot;. They should&#039;ve seen that coming and escape the lawsuit by naming it something else like phone or MacPhone. They sound better anyway. I like phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest I was disappointed when it was called iPhone because I thought Apple was done using &#8220;i&#8221; and had moved on to &#8220;Mac&#8221; or &#8220;&#8221;. They should&#8217;ve seen that coming and escape the lawsuit by naming it something else like phone or MacPhone. They sound better anyway. I like phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-3075</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/looks-like-it-may-not-be-iphone-after-all/#comment-3075</guid>
		<description>phone is looking pretty good right now, alongside yesterday&#039;s iTV (er, tv) announcement</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phone is looking pretty good right now, alongside yesterday&#8217;s iTV (er, tv) announcement</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
