<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can we please stop with the &#8220;[insert device name here]-killer&#8221; junk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/</link>
	<description>Your Ultimate Guide to Thinking Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vito positano</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-90569</link>
		<dc:creator>vito positano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/#comment-90569</guid>
		<description>No, it does not look &quot;awesome&quot; at all. However, its external shape is reminiscent of one of those black rubber-like Verizon phone from the very early 21st C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it does not look &#8220;awesome&#8221; at all. However, its external shape is reminiscent of one of those black rubber-like Verizon phone from the very early 21st C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bstur</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-90565</link>
		<dc:creator>bstur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/#comment-90565</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Michael. 
It would seem that other columnists aren&#039;t smart enough, or are too lazy, to think of terms like &quot;competitor&quot; or &quot;rival&quot; and don&#039;t seem to know how to use a thesaurus...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Michael.<br />
It would seem that other columnists aren&#8217;t smart enough, or are too lazy, to think of terms like &#8220;competitor&#8221; or &#8220;rival&#8221; and don&#8217;t seem to know how to use a thesaurus&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfiejr</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-90564</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfiejr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/#comment-90564</guid>
		<description>definitely agree. what we have seen so far are instead either (a) attempted &quot;knock offs&quot; (copies) of the iPhone, or (b) ... what else?

the iPhone itself is the only &quot;killer&quot; out there - a disruptive new product that makes something/everything else obsolete or marginal. it &quot;killed&quot; every variety of &quot;smartphone&quot; that existed in 2007. then in 2008 its App Store &quot;killed&quot; the old high-priced mobile application setup, which is now in its death throes. 

we&#039;ll see who kills what in 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely agree. what we have seen so far are instead either (a) attempted &#8220;knock offs&#8221; (copies) of the iPhone, or (b) &#8230; what else?</p>
<p>the iPhone itself is the only &#8220;killer&#8221; out there &#8211; a disruptive new product that makes something/everything else obsolete or marginal. it &#8220;killed&#8221; every variety of &#8220;smartphone&#8221; that existed in 2007. then in 2008 its App Store &#8220;killed&#8221; the old high-priced mobile application setup, which is now in its death throes. </p>
<p>we&#8217;ll see who kills what in 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt S.</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-90560</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/#comment-90560</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s use the Palm Pre and the Apple iPhone, just for example.  I wouldn&#039;t say that people think the Pre will actually &quot;kill&quot; the iPhone and put it out of business, my understanding of saying that the Pre will be an &quot;iPhone Killer&quot; means that overall, the Pre will be a better phone than the iPhone.

No phone will &quot;kill&quot; or take another phone off the market.  The Pre will only available for Sprint at the time of release and the iPhone is only available for AT&amp;T right now.  Neither phone can kill one another due to the fact that they are on separate carriers.  Sure if they were on the same carrier, sales could be compared to one another, but pricing and contract pricing per device would also have to be taken into account.  Also, there are definitely big fan followings of both devices; the Apple crowd, the Palm crowd, the Blackberry crowd, etc.  Take me for example, I currently use a Palm Treo 755p on Sprint.  I would LOVE to have an iPhone, but I don&#039;t have AT&amp;T and what I pay with Sprint is such a good deal, I don&#039;t want to leave it.  So, it kinda goes without saying that I&#039;m excited for the Palm Pre to come out for Sprint.  Something iPhone like with its own take on things and a combination of what works well on other phones.  I wouldn&#039;t call myself a Palm fanboy as much as I would call myself an Apple fanboy, but I can only have so much.

Since the Palm Pre isn&#039;t even out yet and I haven&#039;t played with it myself, I can just go off of what has been released about it so far.  If comparing it to iPhone, the network is superior, Sprint&#039;s EVDO Rev. A is much faster than AT&amp;T&#039;s 3G network, the camera/camcorder is 3MP compared to iPhone&#039;s 2MP camera only, the ability to run multiple apps concurrently is something iPhone doesn&#039;t have, and wireless charging is definitely a cool feature.  The iPhone has the ease of use and simplicity going for it, the backing of the App Store and seamless integration with iTunes, and multiple storage capacities available.  The superiority of physical vs. software keyboard is debatable.  I definitely like the physical keyboard on my Treo but using the software keyboard on my iPod Touch with the auto correction feature is also quite quick.  Overall, I&#039;m excited for the Pre to come out, mainly because I can have a cool-looking, full featured, iPhone-like phone, but also because it will drive competition upward and hopefully create better Apple, HTC, and RIM products as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s use the Palm Pre and the Apple iPhone, just for example.  I wouldn&#8217;t say that people think the Pre will actually &#8220;kill&#8221; the iPhone and put it out of business, my understanding of saying that the Pre will be an &#8220;iPhone Killer&#8221; means that overall, the Pre will be a better phone than the iPhone.</p>
<p>No phone will &#8220;kill&#8221; or take another phone off the market.  The Pre will only available for Sprint at the time of release and the iPhone is only available for AT&amp;T right now.  Neither phone can kill one another due to the fact that they are on separate carriers.  Sure if they were on the same carrier, sales could be compared to one another, but pricing and contract pricing per device would also have to be taken into account.  Also, there are definitely big fan followings of both devices; the Apple crowd, the Palm crowd, the Blackberry crowd, etc.  Take me for example, I currently use a Palm Treo 755p on Sprint.  I would LOVE to have an iPhone, but I don&#8217;t have AT&amp;T and what I pay with Sprint is such a good deal, I don&#8217;t want to leave it.  So, it kinda goes without saying that I&#8217;m excited for the Palm Pre to come out for Sprint.  Something iPhone like with its own take on things and a combination of what works well on other phones.  I wouldn&#8217;t call myself a Palm fanboy as much as I would call myself an Apple fanboy, but I can only have so much.</p>
<p>Since the Palm Pre isn&#8217;t even out yet and I haven&#8217;t played with it myself, I can just go off of what has been released about it so far.  If comparing it to iPhone, the network is superior, Sprint&#8217;s EVDO Rev. A is much faster than AT&amp;T&#8217;s 3G network, the camera/camcorder is 3MP compared to iPhone&#8217;s 2MP camera only, the ability to run multiple apps concurrently is something iPhone doesn&#8217;t have, and wireless charging is definitely a cool feature.  The iPhone has the ease of use and simplicity going for it, the backing of the App Store and seamless integration with iTunes, and multiple storage capacities available.  The superiority of physical vs. software keyboard is debatable.  I definitely like the physical keyboard on my Treo but using the software keyboard on my iPod Touch with the auto correction feature is also quite quick.  Overall, I&#8217;m excited for the Pre to come out, mainly because I can have a cool-looking, full featured, iPhone-like phone, but also because it will drive competition upward and hopefully create better Apple, HTC, and RIM products as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick O'Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-90559</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick O'Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/#comment-90559</guid>
		<description>If we were to indulge in the concept an &quot;iPhone killer&quot;... I&#039;m just going to go out on a limb and say the iPhone is invincible. I can&#039;t even imagine another phone coming close. But thats just me. 
(I may be biased)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we were to indulge in the concept an &#8220;iPhone killer&#8221;&#8230; I&#8217;m just going to go out on a limb and say the iPhone is invincible. I can&#8217;t even imagine another phone coming close. But thats just me.<br />
(I may be biased)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwall_hp</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-90558</link>
		<dc:creator>redwall_hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/mac/can-we-please-stop-with-the-insert-device-name-here-killer-junk/#comment-90558</guid>
		<description>I agree.

How many products have been &lt;em&gt;codenamed&lt;/em&gt; &quot;iPod Killer?&quot; (The Zune and a Creative model come to mind.) I&#039;ve yet to see the iPod be &quot;killed.&quot; It just makes a company look stupid when they say they are going to smash their competitor, who has HUGE marketshare, and then of course fail to do.

And don&#039;t get me started on individuals calling everything a &quot;[insert device] killer...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
<p>How many products have been <em>codenamed</em> &#8220;iPod Killer?&#8221; (The Zune and a Creative model come to mind.) I&#8217;ve yet to see the iPod be &#8220;killed.&#8221; It just makes a company look stupid when they say they are going to smash their competitor, who has HUGE marketshare, and then of course fail to do.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t get me started on individuals calling everything a &#8220;[insert device] killer&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

