<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s Phone WILL NOT be called &#8220;iMobile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top News Apple &#187; Apple’s Phone WILL NOT be called “iMobile”</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/comment-page-1/#comment-39891</link>
		<dc:creator>Top News Apple &#187; Apple’s Phone WILL NOT be called “iMobile”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/#comment-39891</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abdylix</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/comment-page-1/#comment-16519</link>
		<dc:creator>abdylix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 02:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/#comment-16519</guid>
		<description>imobile? hmm....there`s already have taked that brand (TUNGSTEN) in my country. how if iMacCell?...it`s not to complicated to say it right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>imobile? hmm&#8230;.there`s already have taked that brand (TUNGSTEN) in my country. how if iMacCell?&#8230;it`s not to complicated to say it right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Minic</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/comment-page-1/#comment-4352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Minic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/#comment-4352</guid>
		<description>iSpy :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iSpy <img src='http://www.applegazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyinthesky</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/comment-page-1/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>spyinthesky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>It will be Macphone or Applephone aimost certainly the former being the most likely. As it will be seriously integrated with Leopard rather than the iPod this seems extreely sensible and will help expand the Mac name ito areas where it can have much more short term impact than in desktop computers alone but will help expand the whole brand considerably to non Mac users thus making a &#039;mac&#039; halo effect on top of the &#039;iPod&#039; halo effect which can only, since it is a separate brand have so much effect. IPod was important in a product that was aimed at non mac users when they were likely to be put off by the Apple/Mac brand generally. Now that it has done its job of making the whole company and Mac brand more receptive it is now logical to bring back the mac/apple brand big time into new product areas to push the expansion to a new level. 

By the way &#039;iCell&#039; would be a  pretty useless brand name in large parts of the World that prefer the term &#039;Mobile&#039; (or other) to Cell phone which is US centric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be Macphone or Applephone aimost certainly the former being the most likely. As it will be seriously integrated with Leopard rather than the iPod this seems extreely sensible and will help expand the Mac name ito areas where it can have much more short term impact than in desktop computers alone but will help expand the whole brand considerably to non Mac users thus making a &#8216;mac&#8217; halo effect on top of the &#8216;iPod&#8217; halo effect which can only, since it is a separate brand have so much effect. IPod was important in a product that was aimed at non mac users when they were likely to be put off by the Apple/Mac brand generally. Now that it has done its job of making the whole company and Mac brand more receptive it is now logical to bring back the mac/apple brand big time into new product areas to push the expansion to a new level. </p>
<p>By the way &#8216;iCell&#8217; would be a  pretty useless brand name in large parts of the World that prefer the term &#8216;Mobile&#8217; (or other) to Cell phone which is US centric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmv9998</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/comment-page-1/#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>jmv9998</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apples-phone-will-not-be-called-imobile/#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>Why not  iCOM....or   iLINK...or   iTALK...or  iSPEAK...or ....iCALL or iTELE..
iLINE..or even iFONE...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not  iCOM&#8230;.or   iLINK&#8230;or   iTALK&#8230;or  iSPEAK&#8230;or &#8230;.iCALL or iTELE..<br />
iLINE..or even iFONE&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
