<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple accounts for 95.8% of Engadget Mobile Traffic&#8230;or does it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apple-accounts-for-958-of-engadget-mobile-trafficor-does-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apple-accounts-for-958-of-engadget-mobile-trafficor-does-it/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin M</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apple-accounts-for-958-of-engadget-mobile-trafficor-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-84776</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apple-accounts-for-958-of-engadget-mobile-trafficor-does-it/#comment-84776</guid>
		<description>I think this actually proves a different point.  People visiting Engadget on an iPhone have no need for the mobile version of the website.  I don&#039;t exactly think of Engadget as a &quot;low-content&quot; site.  The thing is wide and it&#039;s got some bells and whistles.  Getting mobile users onto the &quot;real&quot; internet is what this thing is all about.  
You&#039;re right that Business Week missed the point, but there is another interesting point here as well and I&#039;d love to see a ton more data about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this actually proves a different point.  People visiting Engadget on an iPhone have no need for the mobile version of the website.  I don&#8217;t exactly think of Engadget as a &#8220;low-content&#8221; site.  The thing is wide and it&#8217;s got some bells and whistles.  Getting mobile users onto the &#8220;real&#8221; internet is what this thing is all about.<br />
You&#8217;re right that Business Week missed the point, but there is another interesting point here as well and I&#8217;d love to see a ton more data about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apple-accounts-for-958-of-engadget-mobile-trafficor-does-it/comment-page-1/#comment-84759</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/iphone/apple-accounts-for-958-of-engadget-mobile-trafficor-does-it/#comment-84759</guid>
		<description>That is a REALLY good point, Michael.  Thanks for bringing it up.  I am glad I still subscribe to your RSS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a REALLY good point, Michael.  Thanks for bringing it up.  I am glad I still subscribe to your RSS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
