<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining the Apple &#8220;Power User&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/</link>
	<description>Apple Gazette - An Apple Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:25:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On Power Users of Computers. &#171; Lorie&#8217;s Love Affair With Apple, Linux and All Things Tech. :p</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-12646</link>
		<dc:creator>On Power Users of Computers. &#171; Lorie&#8217;s Love Affair With Apple, Linux and All Things Tech. :p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/#comment-12646</guid>
		<description>[...] On Power Users of&#160;Computers. My thoughts exactly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Power Users of&nbsp;Computers. My thoughts exactly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Digg Effect - Search for Diggs or get Dugg &#187; Defining the Apple “Power User”</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>The Digg Effect - Search for Diggs or get Dugg &#187; Defining the Apple “Power User”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/#comment-603</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;The reason that while Macs today can run Windows, one would be limited when it comes to having a choice of processors, hard drives, graphics adaptors, sound cards, and even the motherboard itself.&#8221;read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;The reason that while Macs today can run Windows, one would be limited when it comes to having a choice of processors, hard drives, graphics adaptors, sound cards, and even the motherboard itself.&#8221;read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavilion</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavilion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 06:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/#comment-540</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;fastest computer processor on the market today...&lt;/strong&gt;

 Programming a computer can be performed in one of numerous languages, ranging from a higher-level language to writing directly in low-level...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>fastest computer processor on the market today&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> Programming a computer can be performed in one of numerous languages, ranging from a higher-level language to writing directly in low-level&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ituloy Angsulong</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Ituloy Angsulong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Funny, how tech people now have their own definition of &quot;Power User&quot;. It&#039;s hard to define now what is &quot;Subjective&quot; and &quot;Relative&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, how tech people now have their own definition of &#8220;Power User&#8221;. It&#8217;s hard to define now what is &#8220;Subjective&#8221; and &#8220;Relative&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>jay vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.applegazette.com/get-a-mac/defining-the-apple-power-user/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>the key word in this whole discussion thus far is &#039;use&#039;, as in &#039;user&#039;, as in &#039;one who uses&#039;.

you can apply old, boring, slow and outdated hardware in ways which produce more actual &#039;use&#039; than bleeding-edge, not-quite-working, hard-core hardware.  the reference between these realms is, of course &#039;use&#039;.

what is meant by a &#039;power user&#039;?  it is, simply, one who uses the power of the computer in front of them.  it doesn&#039;t have to be fast, new, bleeding edge, or even expensive.  a power user doesn&#039;t have any hardware requirement; they are, simply, just using the thing, powerfully.  usually in exciting and interesting, but always -productive- ways.  a power-user applies a computer for whatever actual &#039;use&#039; is intended: game-playing, databases, internet, music, development, whatever.


so .. my point of view is that as a long-time &quot;bleeding-edge software guy&quot; with a partiality to Unix ways of life, i don&#039;t really care what hardware is running, as long as its: a) On, and b) In Use.  my personal measure of investment in computing power has always &quot;how is it being used&quot;.

By way of example for what I mean, I switched to the Powerbook Elite (as in, always try to have the latest powerbook) the day the first lovely (and still useful) tiBooks were available.

Dumping beige-box shrine-building and tempestuous cult-like hardware behaviour from about 17 too-many trips on the weekend to SoCal computer college swap-marts, and after I decided personally that the only thing that mattered was that the computer I use actually fit with any stack of books worth carrying.  That was the principle requirement: form-factor compatible with books.

Its only the form-factor of the Mac way that matters to me as a Powerbook User .. if someone can show me a Unix workstation I can easily slide on the shelf, and use comfortably on the train, I&#039;ll switch to it.  So far, the Powerbook owns the &#039;strictly book form-factor&#039; realm; it is designed for that.

Sure, I&#039;d love to have a very fast computer around, but as I get older, and perhaps a little wiser, I realize that the latest and greatest isn&#039;t always the best.  Sometimes, having 3 or 4 little computers in active use is as good as, or better than, having 1 or 2 super-duper machines running instead. 

So I&#039;d just like to point out that Power is just one aspect of how you could measure &#039;User&#039; in the &quot;Power User&quot; equation .. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the key word in this whole discussion thus far is &#8216;use&#8217;, as in &#8216;user&#8217;, as in &#8216;one who uses&#8217;.</p>
<p>you can apply old, boring, slow and outdated hardware in ways which produce more actual &#8216;use&#8217; than bleeding-edge, not-quite-working, hard-core hardware.  the reference between these realms is, of course &#8216;use&#8217;.</p>
<p>what is meant by a &#8216;power user&#8217;?  it is, simply, one who uses the power of the computer in front of them.  it doesn&#8217;t have to be fast, new, bleeding edge, or even expensive.  a power user doesn&#8217;t have any hardware requirement; they are, simply, just using the thing, powerfully.  usually in exciting and interesting, but always -productive- ways.  a power-user applies a computer for whatever actual &#8216;use&#8217; is intended: game-playing, databases, internet, music, development, whatever.</p>
<p>so .. my point of view is that as a long-time &#8220;bleeding-edge software guy&#8221; with a partiality to Unix ways of life, i don&#8217;t really care what hardware is running, as long as its: a) On, and b) In Use.  my personal measure of investment in computing power has always &#8220;how is it being used&#8221;.</p>
<p>By way of example for what I mean, I switched to the Powerbook Elite (as in, always try to have the latest powerbook) the day the first lovely (and still useful) tiBooks were available.</p>
<p>Dumping beige-box shrine-building and tempestuous cult-like hardware behaviour from about 17 too-many trips on the weekend to SoCal computer college swap-marts, and after I decided personally that the only thing that mattered was that the computer I use actually fit with any stack of books worth carrying.  That was the principle requirement: form-factor compatible with books.</p>
<p>Its only the form-factor of the Mac way that matters to me as a Powerbook User .. if someone can show me a Unix workstation I can easily slide on the shelf, and use comfortably on the train, I&#8217;ll switch to it.  So far, the Powerbook owns the &#8217;strictly book form-factor&#8217; realm; it is designed for that.</p>
<p>Sure, I&#8217;d love to have a very fast computer around, but as I get older, and perhaps a little wiser, I realize that the latest and greatest isn&#8217;t always the best.  Sometimes, having 3 or 4 little computers in active use is as good as, or better than, having 1 or 2 super-duper machines running instead. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;d just like to point out that Power is just one aspect of how you could measure &#8216;User&#8217; in the &#8220;Power User&#8221; equation .. <img src='http://www.applegazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
